The irony of budget cuts and tuition increases
This article has been read 162 times.
Cutting back is the only option to make up for the shortfall
It’s hard to walk anywhere around UNLV without noticing the catastrophic signs declaring doomsday scale budget cuts. Personally, I find it all hilariously entertaining. The university system and student groups around campus have made Gov. Jim Gibbons out to be worse than Hitler. Why?
I’ve read numerous articles and commentaries criticizing the governor for keeping to his campaign promise of not raising taxes. I find it rather ironic that every other time we criticize and mock politicians who make campaign promises and never fulfill them.
But for once we actually have somebody who is upholding the promises he made to the people who elected him. Sadly, the people who criticize politicians for not keeping promises are now criticizing politicians who keep their promises! Make up your minds people!
Personally, I’m very pleased that the governor has the guts to stand up and stick to his principles where most would bend over and grab their ankles at the first sign of trouble.
He vowed not to raise taxes and I praise him for it because to do so would only be harmful to Nevada and its citizens in a time of economic hardship. Gibbons actually has the brains to realize that if the citizens of Nevada have to tighten their belts and do without, so can the government.
Wouldn’t it be selfish to ask us to pony up cash during a recession so the government can be safe and secure?
That’s another thing I find amusing and at times frustrating about this whole to-do over the budget cuts. Everyone is saying, “no budget cuts!” So, what is the solution? As to my understanding none have been offered, or for that matter, thought of.
Well, there was one solution offered by the Board of Regents – increasing tuition by 25 percent. The increase would have helped the university to keep professors and programs. What happened to that solution? It went right out the window thanks to a huge student protest even though such an increase would have helped the imbalanced budget.
What’s the irony in all of this?
The university is a government entity and as such requires money from taxes to operate. Any time the university needs more money, taxes must go up. So when the government suddenly doesn’t have any money to give to the university and the option of raising taxes is out of question, what must the university do? Raise tuition.
After all, the university represents the government and therefore, is government. The beneficiaries of the government’s endowments (i.e. the students) must now pay higher for the service. Tuition has to go up which is equivalent to taxes going up.
Here is what is hilarious – I’m sure the same students who protested against higher tuition because it would directly hit their wallets, support politicians who support raising taxes (Democrats). So the students who helped elect those politicians in office directly see what the equivalent of a tax increase would be – their own tuition going up. But sadly, they still don’t understand.
So we can’t have our tuition go up. But we don’t want to cut the budget. What’s the only other option left? Well, it’s something the drones passing out the anti-budget cut flyers haven’t answered for me when I asked.
Our taxes have to go up! So we have two solutions to the budget cuts- raise tuition or raise taxes. One directly affects the students and one affects everyone else. Either way, somebody is going to have less money in their pockets.
I think the solution to the budget crisis is cutting the budget. Gasp! I’m sure many of you are thinking I’m heartless, but at least I have a brain. I’m paying my own way through college and the budget cuts have directly affected my means of paying.
I used to be a tutor through the university, however, once the budget started getting slashed, I lost my well-paying part-time job. You know what I did? I found work elsewhere, budgeted and saved money in order to stay in college. That’s called life.
Budget cuts are the solution. I would love to have a ton of sections for classes and I certainly don’t want to see departments disappear. However, there are ways to keep those things while still saving money. The university wastes so much of our money as it is. Budget cuts will finally be able to reign in some of that wasteful spending.
Let’s just look at the salaries of university personnel. A total of 571 university employees make over $100,000 a year; eight of those 571 make well over $200,000.
Cut some of the programs that aren’t necessary, such as the ridiculous diversity program. Cut administrative overhead. Cut UNLV football— we lose all the time anyway.
What are some other solutions for Nevada?
How about growing a pair and going through with the Yucca Mountain project. If we did, either Nevadans currently living here would get a check from the federal government each month or, in exchange for Yucca Mountain being here, the state and local governments would get extra federal funding.
We certainly wouldn’t have to worry about budget cuts then. What if, in exchange for Yucca Mountain every citizen currently living in Nevada didn’t have to pay federal income taxes?
All of these ideas were proposed years ago and all of them would have probably helped with our current economic and budget situations, but our very own Sen. Harry Reid disagreed with all of those because he’s beholden more to environmental groups than to the citizens of Nevada.
There is a solution to our problem. Budget Cuts. Gov. Gibbons has the guts to go through with them. We should too.


….Continued from above….
The author says that the tuition raise proposed in December would be the solution to the NSHE current budget issues, however, the 52% cut to UNLV was put forth in January. The tuition hike proposal put forth in December was in response to the 12% budget cut the school suffered in 2007. This current batch of cuts is coming off on top of those cuts that have already been implemented. It seems as if in every session since 2001 the budget has been cut without consideration to the growth of the NSHE.
The author of the article also says that he went out and got a job after being cut from his tutoring job, and good for him. But the reality is, 9.1% of Nevadans (that’s about 20,000 peopl) are unemployed. Finding a job, on top of paying for your own tuition is the hardest it has ever been.
In conclusion I find the argument that the author puts forth is narrow minded and based on incorrect assumptions and should therefore be disregarded
To Fedor, why can’t you attack the argument itself, rather than his alleged biasness. I guess you’re not man or mature enough to do that. If you are woman, still man up. Besides , if he was ethnocentric, why would he be marrying a beautiful Asian woman? Tell me if he is racist or not.
Also, I wholeheartedly agree that we should cut the diversity programs, and it doesn’t do anything for the students anyways. The reason we go to college is to pursue and continue our education. If I want to mingle with other students of different backgrounds, then I want to do it on my own time.
Obviously the two dopes Fedor and Gil didn’t read the whole article, or for that matter actually do some critical thinking–instead they were more than happy to restate their drone opinions and follow their marching orders.
What the author is saying is that yes, a 50% budget cut will be terribly detrimental to the university, but when you have jerks like President Ashley and Jim Rogers who swear up and down not to compromise, that sends a bad message and sets and even worse example to the students, and that the university with the $1 billion dollars that’s spent on the NSHE, there are definately things that need to be cut, things that can be cut.
I went to that “Townhall” which was more of a big “woe is us” fest, and was disgusted. All I heard was raise taxes, raise taxes, raise taxes!! So you’re asking the citizens and businesses of Nevada to pay higher taxes to carry a small population? Well, its actually just going to be the citizens, because any tax passed on business, business will just pass that tax down to the consumer in the form of higher prices. That’s the last thing we need!!
This author has it right, we have to do multiple things, that includes cutting the budget, raising tuition–since students are the ones who go to the universities anyway–and find revenue raising enterprises other than raising taxes.
BRING YUCCA MOUNTAIN HERE!!!!!!!!
good article, don’t let these haters ruin your positive outlook on life.
This opinion is probably as shortsighted as Governor Gibbons actual budget. Both you and the governor are of the opinion that increasing taxes will endanger the future of our state. The real future of our Nevada isn’t found in preserving the status quo in terms of our flawed tax revenue base, but rather in the research facilities of our universities. Everyone from the Economist to President Obama recognizes that alternative energy technology and “green jobs” are the future of our state and national economy. UNLV is on the frontline of this research, as seen by our hosting of the alternative energy conference this last Summer. A 50% budget cut, however, would destroy all progressive. You and the Governor talk about tightening belts, but this measure would be tantamount to chopping off a hungry man’s legs in order to decrease his daily caloric needs. In the end, both the man and Nevada will end up bleeding to death. In conclusion, I must also state that a 25% tuition increase for students and a 6% pay cut for teachers and other public servants is essentially a tax, a devastating tax targeted at the portion of our state’s population which can afford it the least. Fight the budget and pay cuts and protect our state
“Cut some of the programs that aren’t necessary, such as the ridiculous diversity program”
I think you would benefit by attending one of the seminars the diversity program offers as your ethnocentric biases are obvious.