Top

Vicious cycle for urban biking Default Thumbnail

September 13, 2010 by  

Las Vegas is bicycle unfriendly, but it could be worse

I’m sorry, Las Vegas.

I feel the need to apologize because I’ve been a little too hard on you. I’ve spoken some harsh words in the past, blamed you for some things that are not really your fault, and I honestly didn’t give you the little praises that you deserve.

Well, I’m willing to try to see if our relationship can get a little better. You are attempting to do the right thing, and even if you can’t possibly compete with your peers, you’re trying to make living and bicycling here a little better.

I say all this because I recently learned a good lesson.

This past summer, I had the opportunity to live and work in Singapore, at (who knew) UNLV Singapore. It turns out that our own Harrah College of Hotel Administration operates a satellite campus in Singapore that caters to Southeast Asian students. For the month of June, I taught and lived in the central business district in Singapore, just a short walk from campus. While I was there, I saw many magical things: a subway system that was space-aged and super-cheap, the largest and most continuous malls I have ever seen and little fried sesame balls with peanut butter on the inside that were about as good as dessert gets.

But, ever the intrepid cyclist, I flew my bike with me, determined to experience what breakthroughs an ultra-modern, non-Western city has made in the way of sustainable, non-motorized urban transport.

The best way to describe my experience in Singapore is by comparing it to what I consider the worst possible cycling condition on the planet — crossing the Las Vegas Strip.

I believe that the Strip presents more of a barrier to my safety, health and feelings of well-being than an impenetrable forest full of poop-flinging monkeys (which I did see in Singapore). While most of Vegas isn’t terrible, all the roads that cross the Strip have no shoulders or bike lanes, they are crammed full of taxis all jockeying for position and are actually barricaded from the sidewalks, so that if a cyclist does get into trouble, there is no escape. The feelings that I experience crossing the Strip are a mixture of fear, exhilaration and disgust that make me want to move to a civilized city upon reaching the opposite side.

The conditions in Singapore were almost as bad as crossing the Strip on a bike. But rather than being a confined region of bicycle hell, it was like that for every mile of every major street. I would get passed by hundreds if not a thousand cabs per mile. The speed alone was harrowing.

It also seems that Singapore made a conscious decision to not include bikes in the road system. Therefore, not only were there no bike lanes, but the traffic was routed like a freeway on all arterial streets, where cars are expected to make turns at speed. For the majority of the roadways, if I made a mistake or if a car made a mistake or if anything else unexpected occurred, I’d be squished dead.

Only slightly less ridiculous was the off-street path network. The city boasted more than a hundred miles of park connector paths that criss-cross the city in family-friendly routes suitable for bicycles and baby strollers.

My few attempts to navigate this system resulted in my carrying my bike more than on any mountain bike trail in Bootleg Canyon. It is as though the city planners simply superimposed paths on top of the existing street network, and any time the path crossed a street, the street won.

I’d be riding along a nice paved path, only to dead-end at the bottom of a flight of stairs. At the top of the stairs would be a 4-lane road with no crossing. So, I’d play Frogger through to the traffic, carry my bike back down the flight of stairs and continue on the route for less than a half a mile before having to do it again. Needless to say, nobody was out on these paths.

This experience changed my perspective. Singapore is what a modern city looks like if bikes and pedestrians are not included in the transportation mix. The transit system is spectacular, and cabs are everywhere, but if you want to propel yourself, you are taking your life into your own hands.

As I look at the modest attempts Las Vegas has made to encourage and accommodate cycling and walking, maybe it isn’t as hopeless as I was feeling before I boarded the plane to Singapore.

Throughout much of Vegas, there are shoulders or bike paths on arterial streets. The off-street network is limited and poorly connected, but most street crossings are relatively safe. There are a growing number of cyclists on the roads for commuting and recreation.

More importantly, there are plans for a slow and steady increase in bike and pedestrian facilities in the future, so that as Vegas evolves into a modern city, there will be more space for the self-propelled residents. Now, if we can just import those peanut butter sesame balls, we’d have the best of both worlds.

So Las Vegas, please accept my heartfelt apology. You’re not that bad after all.

Comments

6 Responses to “Vicious cycle for urban biking”

  1. Back2Nature on September 14th, 2010 5:35 am

    It sounds scary that I have taken my life into my own hands since 1996 until 2005, and after that I do so less often.

  2. Rachel on September 15th, 2010 12:31 am

    I’m a Singaporean and I must say, you are largely right about my city’s unfriendliness towards cyclists.

    I enlist the park connectors fairly often and even designated cycling paths in “cyling towns” such as Tampines while cycling around and the opinion that “any time the path crossed a street, the street won” is indeed a fair assertion!

    In fact, I found that instead of walking on the pedestrian paths meant for them, the pedestrians strangely preferred to walk on the path meant for cyclists along the Park Connector Network, resulting in many starts/stops/wheeling for me – while I ring the bell a fair distance away allowing pedestrians adequate time to move out of the way, many do not seem to hear the bell/refused to move or get extremely angry. I tried to understand it from their point of view – afterall, I only took to cycling this year and I am largely a pedestrian – so I tried being extremely polite by thanking pedestrians who moved aside to let my bike pass since it seems so troublesome for many and by only riding on paths that have the bicycle logos painted on – but it still puzzles me as to why my cycling experience remains so rough. I sometimes find myself wheeling my bicycle so much it feels like an overgrown baby stroller!

    Last weekend, I learnt how “the street won” when a couple who was walking on the cyclist lane deliberately threw a rock in my face,knocking me off my bicycle. I sprained my ankle in the process, while they laughed. I suspect they were unhappy with me ringing my bell but I did said “Excuse me” and “Sorry” , when they did not move aside. It was pretty ironic that this happened since I was in a designated cycling town (Tampines.)

    My assertion? I’ll never ride on our roads even though I badly want to ride to work! I had a literature teacher from England in junior college who rode daily to school each day – a short distance he said – but he had to be warded in the hospital for 2 weeks once when a car plowed into him on the road and did not stop.

    On the other hand, I must say I am still grateful for the Park Connector Network. At least it provides some respite, else, I do not see where else I can cycle in Singapore since even the park near my place prohibits bicycles!

  3. Terence on September 15th, 2010 4:29 am

    Anything that doesn’t earn the Singapore government money is a strict no-no. The subway earns $100 million yearly, while vehicle taxes gives the government a few billion dollars a year. So unless bikers can top that, there won’t be any improvements soon.

  4. yang_man on September 18th, 2010 11:59 pm

    If you have been to China in the 80”s and 90′s where there were designated cycling track, you will know it will only cause more congestion. The trains and buses are a more efficient way of moving people around and most Chinese cities have removed them to give more space to the motorist.

    Singapore is located just above the equator and is sweltering hot most of the time. Locals don’t try to cycle to work for a simple reason, unless you want to arrive at work smelling like a old pair of socks. Only Caucasians and foreign workers thinks this is like where they come from and free to cycle any where they want.

    Singapore is only 700+ sq km in total, including nature reserves and has one of the highest population density (3rd after Macau and Monaco according to Wikipedia). Clearly there aren’t enough space to accommodate everyone.

    Instead of yelling and taking pot-shots at my country, think again

  5. Singaporean on December 16th, 2010 10:28 am

    Yangman…. it takes courage to admit that we are wrong and it is damn clear our planners never take into account cycling… May I correct you that besides “Caucasians and foreign workers” many Singaporeans want to cycle but are put off by the lack of infrastructure. And considering we are trying to fight climate change…. cycling and stop driving a car that can sit 5 but yet is only filled by 1 driver who is often stuck in a jam spewing ozone killing exhaust is way way better….

    I am a Singaporean by the way….

Bottom
porno Free porn sex Free porn Free porn sexfilme german porno Free porn Deutsch Porno porno porn Desktop Wallpapers Free Porn Free Porn c99 shell, r57 shell, c99.txt, r57.txt